June,
1990
The
Obligations of Catholics and the Rights of Unborn Children
A Pastoral Statement by: Most Reverend John J. Myers, Bishop of
Peoria, June, 1990
To: The Clergy, Religious, and Laity of the Diocese of Peoria
My
dear friends:
A decision of the Supreme Court in July of 1989 which reaffirmed
the role of government in regulating abortion has resulted in renewed
controversy. In the months since then, some politicians who consider
themselves good Catholics have endorsed the view that abortion ought
to be legal and even funded by the government. Some Catholic voters
appear confused and some even to have faltered in their obligations
in conscience to the unborn.
I
have recently issued a "Pastoral Statement on the Obligations
of Catholics and the Rights of Unborn Children." I invite you
to reflect upon and pray about the pastoral statement. It flows
from my deep concern for the unborn, but also from genuine concern
about those who misguidedly support abortion, including Catholic
voters and Catholics in public life. Patience, compassion and pastoral
concern must always characterize our dealings with women who, for
whatever reason, seek to deal with unwanted pregnancy by the expedient
of abortion. At the same time, it is important to note that sound
pastoral practice can only be based on the truth. And the truth
is that direct abortion is the unjust killing of innocent human
beings.
Catholics
have the same freedom as other citizens in making political choices.
They also have the duty to follow a well-formed conscience. This
pastoral statement respects this freedom and does not favor one
political party over another or recommend one candidate in preference
to another. It does attempt, however, to make clear the moral framework
within which Catholics must make their political decisions if they
are to be responsible.
Catholic
faith and teaching have condemned abortion since the earliest days
of the church. Modern technology has made the question more urgent,
but science has confirmed our understanding that at conception a
unique human being begins. This unborn human being shares with every
other member of the human family a basic moral right to life.
Public
law and public policy must be committed to justice for every person.
We Catholics have made a comprehensive commitment to justice and
to seeking a decent life for everyone, especially the poor and marginalized.
No right, however is more an issue of fundamental justice than the
right to be born, the right to live.
I
joined the other Catholic bishops of the country in November of
1989 in approving a statement which included the point: "No
Catholic can responsibly take a pro-choice stand when the choice
in question involves the taking of innocent human life." No
one can reasonably claim to be "personally opposed" but
publicly in favor of pro-abortion laws and policies. My pastoral
statement builds on this teaching:
"Let
there be no doubt that striving for legal abortion is radically
inconsistent with the Catholic faith. Any citizen or public official
who helps to make abortion more widely available, or any priest,
religious or theologian who teaches that it ought to be made available,
commits a grave injustice against the most vulnerable members of
the human family. Those who openly commit such injustices while
purporting to share the Catholic faith scandalize the faithful and
undermine the teaching of the church. By their own actions they
seriously weaken their own relationship with the church, the Body
of Christ."
Catholics
who, because of an incorrectly formed conscience, dissent from this
church teaching, should recognize that they have separated themselves
in a significant way from the Catholic community. Such a choice
has serious consequences, even if the person acts in the mistaken
belief that it is permissible.
We
must pray for one another, for the unborn and for all those who
hold responsibility for public policy. We must address other citizens
and our public officials with determination and conviction, but
we must also attend to the tone of the public discourse. Our Lord
Jesus displayed dignity in even the most difficult moments. He always
respected others, even those who unjustly sought His death. He calls
us to act, surely, but always following His example of love.
Mother
Teresa of Calcutta has often said, "If you do not want your
babies, give them to me." Echoing her words, I say in the name
of the Catholic community of the Peoria Diocese, if you do not want
your babies, give them to us. We will accept them. We will find
them homes. We will offer them a chance to live and to love. We
will share with them the good news of Jesus Christ.
We
stand in need of a moral miracle. However great our own efforts,
only the Provident God can touch the hearts and minds of millions
of our sisters and brothers who are tragically mistaken on the important
issue of abortion. Let us ask Our Lady of Guadalupe, patroness of
the Americas, to seek the grace from her Divine Son, that each member
of our society may love the unborn as He loves them. As children
of the loving God, we must turn to Him in the face of these seemingly
insurmountable problems. His truth will set us free.
With
kindest personal regards, I am
Sincerely in the Lord,
Most Rev. John J. Myers
Bishop of Peoria
The
Obligations of Catholics and the Rights of Unborn Children
At the conclusion of his 1987 pastoral visit to the United
States of America, Pope John Paul II challenged us, as Americans,
to live completely the noble precepts of our Constitution by respecting
the rights and dignity of every human being:
For
this reason, America, your deepest identity and truest character
as a nation is revealed in the position you take toward the human
person. The ultimate test of your greatness is the way you treat
every human being, but especially the weakest and most defenseless
ones. 1
As
Bishop of the Diocese of Peoria, I offer you my own prayerful meditation
on this challenge of the Peoria Diocese to reflect upon and pray
about the following letter in order that we might together enrich
the lives of so many by our desire to be true followers of Christ.
Others who might have an interest are invited to consider it so
that they might better understand our reasons for endorsing or opposing
certain public policies.
I.
The Present Situation
Today, throughout the world, we are witnessing a breakthrough of
human freedom based on a conviction about the rights and dignity
of all men and women. In Russia, Eastern Europe, the Baltic States,
South Africa and many other places, the cry for freedom and human
rights has resulted in dramatic changes in governments and policies.
Likewise in our own nation we have witnessed a growing sensitivity
regarding human dignity. One year ago the Supreme Court handed down
a ruling significantly restoring the authority of public officials
to protect the lives of unborn children by restricting the legality
of abortion. In response to this decision, many state legislatures
are considering legislation affording a greater protection of the
rights of the unborn. Our responsibility as citizens and as people
of faith is to support these efforts to secure justice for the weakest
and most vulnerable members of the human family.
Each
citizen, including the Catholic citizen, has both the right and
the duty to vote according to conscience. This pastoral has no intention
of disregarding these rights and duties. It does not favor any political
party or any individual candidate for office. It does intend, however,
to present objective moral considerations which must guide Catholics
of sound and well-formed conscience in making responsible political
choices.
As
pastor of the diocese, I am charged by the Lord to proclaim with
confidence and clarity the Gospel in all its fullness. As the Holy
Father declared during his first visit to the United States, "in
our ministry at the service of life, we are called to testify to
the fullness of the truth we hold, so that we may all know the stand
of the Catholic Church on the utter inviolability of human life
from the moment of conception." 2
Seventeen
years ago, before the Supreme Court legalized abortion throughout
the United States, few Catholic politicians favored legal abortion,
and few Catholic voters were willing to support office seekers who
did not uphold the fundamental right to life of unborn children.
It was virtually unheard of for a priest, religious, or Catholic
theologian to express support for legal abortion.
Today
the situation has changed. Under the strains and tensions of contemporary
politics, some politicians who consider themselves good Catholics
endorse the view that abortion ought to be legal and even funded
by the government. Some appear to adopt this position out of political
expediency. Others seem to lose sight of the basic dignity of human
life at every stage and in all conditions.
Some
Catholic voters also appear to falter in their duties in justice
and charity to the unborn. Some who maintain a pro-life view neglect
to act on their commitment in the exercise of their responsibilities
as citizens. Certain Catholic theologians, some priests and religious
publicly endorse the view that the right to life of unborn children
lacks sufficient importance to warrant protection by public law.
In
these circumstances, the Church's constant and certain teaching
on the dignity of human life must be clearly restated and steadfastly
reaffirmed. Let there be no doubt that striving for legal abortion
is radically inconsistent with the Catholic faith. Any citizen or
public official who helps to make abortion more widely available,
or any priest, religious, or theologian who teaches that it ought
to be made available, commits a grave injustice against the most
vulnerable members of the human family. Those who openly commit
such injustices, while purporting to share the Catholic faith, scandalize
the faithful and undermine the teaching of the Church. By their
own actions they seriously weaken their own relationship with the
Church, the Body of Christ.
All
of us are entitled to make legitimate choices concerning matters
affecting our lives; but none of us are entitled to choose that
an innocent helpless human being be put to death. There is, and
can be, no such thing as an authentic "pro-choice" Catholic.
It
is a sad irony that many contemporary cultures that have achieved
previously unknown levels of material wealth and comfort now risk
squandering the moral and spiritual treasures that are their true
patrimony. No society which permits the unjust destruction of human
life - born or unborn - can be truly rich. As Mother Teresa has
reminded us, such a society is suffering a moral and spiritual poverty
whose ravages exceed any measure of material want. At this moment,
then, it is fitting that the Catholic Church should call on her
own faithful and all persons of good will to remember their great
heritage of respect for all innocent human life.
Our
concern for human life is far-ranging. Our consistent attention
and best efforts must be focused not only on protecting life, but
also on addressing the issues of poverty, the family in crisis,
racism, and militarism, and on correcting economic and political
systems skewed to serve the interests of power rather than the common
good of the human family.
II.
The Church's Historic Teaching on Abortion
The practice of abortion has been condemned by Christian teaching
since the earliest days of the Church. Over the centuries, the magisterium
has never deviated from its clear and firm teaching that the direct
killing of innocent human beings, whether born or unborn, is always
gravely wrong. Belief in the inviolability of all innocent human
life is thus integral to Catholic faith. No faithful Catholic may
form his or her conscience according to any norm authorizing the
taking of innocent life, whether by abortion or any other act, on
the grounds that the life in question is too young, too old, useless,
insignificant, unwanted or otherwise unworthy of protection.
The
Church's condemnation of abortion pre-dates by centuries developments
in the sciences of embryology and genetics which place the humanity
of the unborn child beyond question. These sciences confirm that
what begins at conception is a unique human being. Its status as
human is a biological fact. While dependent on its mother, it is
genetically distinct. Its human rights are undiminished by its small
size, early stage of development, or condition of dependency. The
unborn human being shares with every member of the human family
a basic right to life.
The
Second Vatican Council called abortion an "abominable crime"
and said that "life must be protected with utmost care from
the moment of conception." (See Gaudium et Spes, 51). Under
Canon Law, any Catholic who formally participates in an effective
abortion, knowing that there are special ecclesiastical sanctions
attached, is automatically excommunicated. The teaching that abortion
is gravely immoral and, where done with sufficient awareness and
freedom of the will, mortally sinful, is certain. Dissent from this
teaching is theologically illegitimate.
III.
Why Public Law Must Protect the Unborn
Public law wisely does not attempt to forbid every immoral act or
require that citizens fulfill every one of their moral obligations.
There are, however, certain evil acts which the law of any just
society must forbid. One of the central purposes of public authority
is to prevent injustices. Gravely unjust acts, especially acts of
unjust killing, cannot be legally tolerated. Nor can public law
permit the unjust killing of a whole class of human beings while
protecting the lives of others.
Catholics
and everyone committed to justice in society must seek a just system
of laws. We must address ourselves to the public debate with determination
and conviction. It is also important that we attend to the tone
of the public discourse. We must be mindful of the dignity that
Our Lord Jesus displayed in even the most difficult situations.
We will do well to recall His constant respect for other persons,
even those who unjustly sought His death. The Lord calls us to act,
surely, but to do so following His example.
Opposition
to abortion is not a sectarian position. Many Eastern Orthodox and
Protestant Christians, Mormons, Jews, members of other faiths, and
of no faith join Catholics in condemning abortion. Catholics who
seek basic legal protection for the rights of unborn children are
not seeking to impose Catholic doctrine on those who do not share
their faith. That a new human life comes into existence at conception
is a scientific fact, not a theological opinion. That law should
protect the lives of the innocent is a fundamental principle for
the just ordering of society, not a religious dogma.
While
it is true that divine revelation deepens our understanding of the
dignity of human life, natural reason can and should acknowledge
the fact that all human persons have the right not to be killed
unjustly. Justice requires that laws against killing be broad and
evenhanded, protecting the weak as well as the strong, the poor
as well as the rich, the disparaged as well as the favored. Indeed,
justice demands that public law have a special concern for the most
vulnerable members of the human family.
IV.
The Responsibilities of Citizens and Office Holders
The erosion of respect for the sanctity of human life in contemporary
Western societies, including the United States, is a moral tragedy.
This erosion is evident in many aspects of contemporary social life
and nowhere more than in the failure of public law to protect the
lives of unborn children.
Over
the past seventeen years, millions of unborn children have been
killed by abortions. Many of these killings have been paid for by
state governments which provide abortions for indigent women. Thus,
not only has government failed in its duty to protect the unborn
against unjust aggression, it has often been a cooperator in the
evil of abortion.
As
voters, Catholics are under an obligation to avoid implicating themselves
in abortion. There can be no assurance that voters will invariably
have a qualified pro-life candidate to choose. In such a case abstention
is a permissible political response. There are also certain limited
circumstances (as in an election between two pro-abortion candidates,
one of whom is more extreme than the other) in which it is possible
for a Catholic legitimately to vote for a pro-abortion candidate.
However, a Catholic may never count an office-seeker's advocacy
of legal abortion or public funding of abortion as a reason to favor
that person's candidacy. Indeed, it is wrong not to count such advocacy
as a very weighty reason against the candidacy. A Catholic may support
the candidacy of someone who would permit unjust killing only when
the real alternatives are candidates who would permit even more
unjust killing.
In
reminding Catholic citizens of their obligations to respect the
rights of the unborn, the Church does not endorse a policy of "single
issue" politics. Issues do not hold office; people do. But
candidates for public office are judged above all by their commitment
to justice and to the common good. The willingness of an office
seeker to permit, and even to fund, the unjust killing of the unborn
reveals a shocking lack of commitment to the rights of the weakest
and most vulnerable members of our society.
A
public official who would deny unborn children the protection of
laws enjoyed by other citizens is guilty of grave injustice. Ordinarily
it is morally illicit to help such a person achieve an office in
which he or she will be in a position do such an injustice. Those
who assist such candidates because of their position on abortion
are guilty of complicity in the abortions their election would make
possible. Let all Catholics be mindful of the recent unanimous declaration
of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops: "No Catholic
can responsibly take a pro-choice stand when the choice in question
involves the taking of innocent human life." 3
The
primary, general responsibilities of those in public authority are
to do no injustices and, within the limits of their authority, to
work for justice. Catholics who hold public office cannot legitimately
support legislation or any public policy which deprives unborn children
of their basic right to live. The Church is aware of, and sensitive
to, the fact that not all public officials have the same capacity
to defend the rights of the unborn, the poor and the oppressed.
A member of the judiciary ordinarily does not have the same capacity
to initiate change that a member of the legislature has. A member
of the executive branch also ordinarily has limited opportunities
in this regard, due to the nature of the office. There are also
differences between those involved at the local, state, and federal
levels.
While
acknowledging the difficulties and limitations inherent in each
level and branch of government, the Church urges public officials
to be aware that they cannot hold themselves excused from their
duties as disciples of the Lord. They must be able to stand before
the Lord with a clear conscience and say they defend the rights
of all human beings, at every stage of existence, to the best of
their ability. They must never take refuge in the specious argument
that they must enforce the law, whatever it may be. Persons of good
conscience must refrain from seeking office if the price of holding
office is the enforcement of evil laws which allow the killing of
the innocent.
Public
officials of all faiths and no faith should remember the harsh judgments
that future generations level against those once in public office.
One need only recall history's judgments on politicians and judges
who made or enforced the segregation laws in our own country for
so many years. Let them also recall the judgment of nations on public
officials who attempted to take refuge behind unjust laws during
the last world war. No one accepted the excuse then, no one should
expect future generations to accept it.
Formal
complicity in any legislation or public policy promoting abortion
is gravely wrong. Under certain limited circumstances, a Catholic
legislator may vote for legislation which does not fully protect
the rights of the unborn if the alternative is legislation which
jeopardizes those rights even more seriously. Thus, a conscientious
Catholic legislator might vote for a measure that would protect
some unborn children, but not all of them. Support for such legislation
is permissible, however, only if the legislator decides there is
at that time no reasonable hope of enacting legislation which would
protect equally all unborn children; a legislator in this position
should make it clear that the legislation for which he or she is
willing to vote is not adequate, and should work to make possible
the eventual enactment of more just legislation.
The
Church has always understood temporal affairs as the special responsibility
of the lay faithful. Indeed, the vocation of the laity is to sanctify
the world. This sanctification requires, above all, the promotion
and protection of human dignity; thus the defense of human rights
is an essential part of the lay vocation. As the Holy Father has
forcefully taught: "The common outcry which is justly made
on behalf of human rights... is false and illusory if the right
to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition
for all other personal rights, is not defended with maximum determination."
4
Pope
John Paul II has also observed that the laity are themselves sanctified
in their professional and social endeavors. Thus, he says, "to
respond to their vocation, the lay faithful must see their daily
activities as occasion to join themselves to God, fulfill His will,
serve other people, and lead them to communion with God in Christ."
5 Religious faith, and the commitment to human rights and dignity
it inspires, must animate one's whole life in the world. Catholic
teaching rejects a notion of faith imprisoned in the private sphere
of devotional practice. It calls instead for a "unity of life,"
whereby faith expresses itself in action which offers up to God
a world sanctified by respect for the dignity of all humanity.
Although
the duty to effect the legal protection of the rights of unborn
children falls primarily on the lay faithful, the priests and religious,
especially those who are theologians, have a special responsibility
to foster the Church's teachings on the sanctity of human life.
Theology has been aptly described as "faith seeking understanding."
Theologians must help the faithful understand the profound truths
that all human life is sacred and that every human being is a child
of God. It is a particularly grave scandal when a priest, religious,
or theologian publicly supports the legal right to abortion.
V.
Types of Complicity in Abortion
Moralists distinguish between "formal" and "material"
cooperation in wrongdoing. This distinction is highly relevant to
the obligations of citizens who must choose between pro-abortion
candidates, and legislators who must choose between legislative
proposals which do not fully protect the rights of the unborn.
One
formally cooperates in another's wrongful act when one participates
in the immoral act in such a way that it becomes one's own. In the
case of abortion, one formally cooperates when one performs abortions,
or acts to encourage, counsel, facilitate, or make abortions available.
One is formally complicit in the injustice of abortion when one
votes for a candidate even partially on the basis of his or her
pro-abortion positions. The same is true when a legislator votes
for legislation even partially for the purpose of making abortion
available.
One
who supports legal abortion cannot avoid formal complicity by maintaining
that he or she wills not abortion as such, but only the freedom
of others to choose abortion. Anyone who supports legal abortions
seeks to remove from one class of human beings a basic protection
afforded to others. By helping to make abortion available, a person
becomes formally complicit in its basic injustice, whether or not
he or she would actively encourage anyone else to have an abortion.
From the ethical point of view, there is no distinction between
being "pro-choice" and being "pro-abortion."
One
materially cooperates in another's wrongdoing when one's acts help
to make that wrongdoing possible, although one does not intend that
wrongdoing. Material cooperation in abortion takes place when one
does not will that an abortion happen, or that the unborn be left
unprotected from abortion, but where one's actions - although motivated
by another purpose - nevertheless help to make an abortion possible.
All
formal cooperation in abortion is gravely immoral. So is most material
cooperation in abortion. However, there may he limited circumstances
under which certain forms of material cooperation are permissible.
For example, a hospital worker responsible for cleaning and maintaining
an operating room where abortions are sometimes performed may carry
out his or her tasks without being implicated in the immoral act.
The worker may oppose abortion and intend only to facilitate the
morally upright, indeed laudable, surgical procedures performed
there. He or she merely accepts as an unintended albeit foreseen
consequence that the well-maintained facility will enable physicians
to perform abortions. Another acceptable form of material cooperation
is that of the citizen who votes for a pro-choice candidate with
the intention of helping to prevent the election of someone whose
pro-abortion position is even more extreme. The same is true for
the legislator who votes for legislation permitting some abortions
in order to prevent the enactment of legislation permitting even
more.
Most
material cooperation in abortion is grossly unfair. Only in very
limited circumstances will material cooperation be consistent with
Christ's command that we do unto others as we would have others
do unto us. Even in such circumstances one must take care not to
slip into wrongful material or formal complicity in abortion. If
one's employment or office becomes a serious occasion of sin, one's
chief responsibility is to find new employment or a different office.
VI.
Conscience and Dissent
The political debate about abortion has produced much muddled thinking
about the possibilities of conscientious dissent from the Church's
teaching on the dignity of all human life. It is all too common
for Catholic politicians to say they are "personally"
opposed to abortion but will nevertheless vote to permit it, and
even fund it, out of respect for the consciences of those who hold
different views. This "respect" for another's conscience
should never require abandoning one's own. Conscientious opposition
to abortion, rooted in an understanding of the sanctity of human
life, may not be sacrificed to the mistaken consciences of those
who would unjustly take the life of an unborn baby.
The
fallacy of this kind of "personal" opposition should be
apparent to anyone who considers the reasons for opposing abortion.
One who acts to permit the unjust killing of the unborn is ordinarily
formally complicit in it. Even where such a person's complicity
is material, it is usually unfair material complicity. The Golden
Rule forbids such complicity: no officeholder would support legislation
protecting everyone else's life, but permitting his or her own life
to be taken at the will of another. Any politician who wills that
the unborn be excluded from the protection of the law therefore
commits a grave injustice. No one willing to commit such injustices
should be entrusted with public authority.
Some
say that Catholics who conscientiously disagree with the Church's
teaching on the sanctity of life may, in good conscience, support
legal abortion or abortion funding. This position misunderstands
the nature of conscience and the role of authoritative teaching
in Christian life. Although we must all follow our consciences,
the task of conscience is not to create moral truth, but perceive
it. It is quite possible for an individual to perceive the moral
reality of a particular situation erroneously. Such a person may
be sincere, but he or she is sincerely wrong.
The
Church's moral teaching provides specific norms for the formation
of the Christian conscience. Many of these arise from and express
requirements of human nature itself. That is the case with the norm
against direct abortion. The specific norms taught by the Church
in this area are not mere optional proposals. They state what is
necessary for Christian life. For a Catholic to refuse, knowingly
and willingly, to form his or her conscience in accord with these
authoritative norms is to withhold part of his or her heart, mind,
and soul from union with Christ and His Church. Such people exclude
themselves, in important respects, from Christian life and the Catholic
community.
Catholics
who publicly dissent from the Church's teaching on the right to
life of all unborn children should recognize that they have freely
chosen by their own actions to separate themselves from what the
Catholic Church believes and teaches. They have also separated themselves
in a significant way from the Catholic community. The Church cannot
force such people to change their position; but she can and does
ask them honestly to admit in the public forum that they are not
in full union with the Church.
An
authentic conscience is one's best judgment in matters of moral
choice. It is not a matter of "feeling." Nor must it degenerate
into rationalizing behavior condemned by Christian teaching. Catholic
faith acknowledges the authority of the magisterium to propose norms
of behavior for the faithful. Christ Himself through the gift of
the Holy Spirit assures the absolute reliability of the teaching
of the bishops in communion with the Pope, when - as in the case
of abortion - three conditions have been met: the teaching concerns
a matter of faith or morals, the bishops of the whole world have
held the same thing on the matter, and they have taught it as a
truth which the faithful must accept unconditionally as certain
(Lumen Gentium,25). A faithful Catholic will therefore form his
or her conscience in accord with any such teaching of the Church.
Does the Church demand of the faithful blind obedience? Not at all.
In forming conscience in accord with the magisterium, faithful Catholics
act on their conscientious belief that Christ commissioned the apostles
and their successors to "go forth and teach all nations."
Catholic
faith does not recognize a "right" to dissent from teachings
that have been proposed authoritatively by the Church and are integral
to Christian life. One who practices such dissent, even in the mistaken
belief that it is permissible, may remain a Catholic in some sense,
but has abandoned the full Catholic faith. For such a person to
express "communion" with Christ and His Church by the
reception of the sacrament of the Eucharist is objectively dishonest.
VII.
The Fullness of Christian Responsibility to the Unborn
In our day, the lives of unborn children are subject to unprecedented
threats. Catholics are called to do more than merely avoid complicity
in killing. We are called by Christ Himself to come to the aid of
the vulnerable, the weak, the oppressed. We must, by word and deed,
bear witness to the sanctity of all human life.
It
is a cause for great joy that so many Catholics have joined with
other Christians, Jews, members of other religions, and those professing
no religion, in valiant efforts to defend the human rights of the
unborn. Some have made heroic sacrifices in this cause. While heroism
cannot be demanded of all, no Catholic should be content with the
mere avoidance of wrongdoing. All should find positive ways to promote
respect for human life.
Our
first responsibility is to pray. Let us ask the Author of Life to
increase our own respect for His precious gift of life. Let us pray,
too, for the victims of abortion and for its perpetrators. At the
same time, let us do all we can in the social and political domains
to secure the right to life of the unborn child and to eliminate
the reasons which lead some to choose abortion, or to assist others
so to choose. Let us work tirelessly in our families and communities
to spread the message of the Gospel that all human beings possess
a shared dignity as children of God.
VIII.
The Church's Response to the Abortion Culture
Abortion is a great evil, but the Church has never regarded it as
an isolated problem. As an assault on human life at its most vulnerable
stage, abortion expresses, and itself engenders, a wider collapse
of public morality. A culture in which personal pleasure or personal
comfort are exalted, pornography is pervasive, promiscuity presumed,
and marital infidelity commonly practiced, is not one likely to
cherish unborn life. In order to help end the evil of abortion,
the Church must therefore address those social conditions and moral
dispositions which make it appear to some as if it were a legitimate,
even attractive option.
The
task is twofold. In the first instance, the Church must devote herself
with renewed purpose to the promotion of family values. The family
reveals to us something of God's purpose for mankind. In the family,
we first meet Christ. In the family, we see human lives at their
beginning and at their end. In the family, we see a pattern of protection
and love. This pattern is intended by God, who has given us the
Holy Family as a model. The Church must uphold her historic teaching
that marriage is a commitment for life, that parenthood is a vocation
which demands unique sacrifices, and that both bring many graces,
joys, and blessings.
The
Church also has practical responsibilities. It should cooperate
with other institutions and agencies in helping women whose circumstances
drive them to contemplate the destruction of their unborn children.
It should remind the community of its responsibilities to all, particularly
the poor, and especially poor women and children. A properly pro-life
attitude treats poverty, ignorance, and disease as offenses to human
dignity. The pro-life ethic is truly a "seamless garment"
of concern for human life in all its stages.
Today
women are often tempted to request or submit to abortions because
they find themselves in difficult - indeed in some cases desperate
- circumstances. All too often, pregnant women are abandoned by
the father of their children. Often they lack supportive families
and other important human and material resources. People of good
will, rightly sympathetic to the plight of these women, are sometimes
misled into thinking they would be well served by policies allowing
them to do away with their "unwanted" offspring. However,
it is a misguided compassion which views killing as a solution to
these difficulties. Public and private efforts should he made to
help pregnant women facing such circumstances. In particular, organizations
such as Birthright deserve strong encouragement. Women should be
presented with the range of alternatives to abortion, and supported
in their efforts to secure a decent and dignified life for themselves
and their children.
Conclusion
In concluding his most recent pastoral visit to our country, Pope
John Paul II recalled the bounty of America and the nobility of
our national ideals. Every American Catholic should consider prayerfully
his prophetic words to us:
The
best traditions of your land presume respect for those who cannot
defend themselves. If you want equal justice for all, and true freedom
and lasting peace, then, America, defend life! All the great causes
that are yours today will have meaning only to the extent that you
guarantee the right to life and protect the human person.
Feeding
the poor and welcoming refugees; reinforcing the social fabric of
this nation; promoting the true advancement of women; securing the
rights of minorities; pursuing disarmament, while guaranteeing legitimate
defense: all this will succeed only if respect for life and its
protection by the law is granted to every human being from conception
until natural death.
Every
human person- no matter how vulnerable or helpless, no matter how
young or how old, no matter how healthy, handicapped, or sick, no
matter how useful or productive for society- is a being of inestimable
worth created in the image of God. This is the dignity of America,
the reason she exists, the condition for her survival- yes, the
ultimate test of her greatness: to respect every human person, especially
the weakest and most defenseless ones, those as yet unborn.
Ultimately,
God will not judge our nation on its economic prosperity, military
strength, or international influence and prestige, but on how well
it promotes and protects the dignity of every human being. May the
Judge of Nations not find us wanting.
Peoria,
Illinois
June 1, 1990
Footnotes
1) "The Human Person - God's Greatest Blessing" in John
Paul II in America (Boston: Daughters of St. Paul) 1987, p. 309.
2)
Homily at the Washington Mall, October 7, 1979.
3)
NCCB Resolution on Abortion, November 7, 1989.
4)
Christifideles Laici, 38.
5)
Christifideles Laici, 17.
6)
"The Human Person - God's Greatest Blessing" in John Paul
II in America (Boston: Daughters of St. Paul) 1987, p. 309.
 |
About
the Archbishop |